Saturday, May 25, 2013

The Office Is Closed

I remember my dad telling me about the last time he saw Willie Mays play. It was in 1973, Willie’s last year. Willie had been traded to the Mets from the Giants the previous year for Charlie Williams, a pitcher who only appeared in three games that year and posted an ERA of 8.86(!), and $50,000. Willie was a shell of his former self, and in the last at-bat my dad saw him make, the Hall of Famer and arguably greatest player ever, got a hit….and fell down on his way to first base. It was hard to watch, I’m sure.
Like an aging star athlete NBC’s The Office has fallen down on its way to first numerous times as it played out it’s final seasons. Like Willie with the Mets, Michael Jordan with the Wizards, Jerry Rice with the Seahawks, or Rickey Henderson with the Mets, Mariners, Padres, Red Sox, Dodgers, Newark Bears, et. al., sometimes the greats just can’t call it quits and hang around too long.

The last two seasons of The Office have been pretty close to an unmitigated disaster. Ever since Steve Carell’s Michael Scott found love and left the Dunder Mifflin Paper Company (“the people person's paper people”) for Colorado, the show didn’t really seem to know what to do with itself. Like a great athlete in decline, it was occasionally able to show a flash of what once made it great, but the flashes were few and far too brief. From the bizzaro creeper antics of James Spader’s Robert California, to the ill-conceived promotion of Andy to Regional Manager and effectively turning him into a Michael Scott clone (and a poor one at that), to this seasons manufactured Halpert Family Crisis that couldn’t have felt more like a manufactured crisis if the show had been titled The Factory instead of The Office, the show that had once been a pacesetter, now seemed like a broken down old clunker. Perhaps Michael Scott put it best, speaking unknowingly prophetically:


But despite it’s fall from grace over the past two or three seasons, I still watch it every week. Though now I’m hoping to be surprised by some genuinely funny moment, no longer expecting it. I saw a commenter on a bulletin board explain it this way. It's like visiting a grandparent in a nursing home. You hope it'll be like old times but know it won't be as they’re just a shadow of their former self. But you visit because you love them and remember all the good times you had. And even though its not what you hope for or remember you're glad you came. That sums it up about perfectly.

My wife and I loved The Office. We watched it every week, and usually together. Back in those early days, and this is really silly, we both even had TV crushes on Jim and Pam. Her for Jim, me for Pam, just so we’re clear. I was friends with Jenna Fischer and Robert R. Shafer (Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration) on MySpace and actually interacted with them. Robert’s a big Angels fan, like me. I remember how revolutionary it looked the first time I saw it. I had never seen it’s forebear, Rickey Gervais’ original BBC version, and loved the mockumentary style. I loved how it focused on these small moments for the big laughs. A throw away comment there, a sideways glance there, an awkward pause pretty much everywhere. It was so fresh and so brilliant. This is almost too geeky to admit, but I penned a little parody script to be acted out with my co-workers and friends in various roles and shot part of the opening credit sequence. Unlike Threat Level Midnight, the rest remains mercifully un-filmed and incomplete.

The writing was superb, but the cast was perfect. Carell never won an Emmy for playing Michael Scott, which is kind of inexplicable when you consider he made a bumbling, obnoxious neurotic who took a lack of self-awareness to soaring new highs lows and suffered from a near terminal case of foot-in-mouth disease, appear equally as sympathetic and lovable. Carell’s brilliance was even more apparent when he left the show after Season 7 and, as mentioned earlier, the writers tried to turn Ed Helms’ Andy “Nard Dawg” Bernard into Michael Scott 2.0. There can be only one Michael Scott, and Steve Carell is he.

John Krasinski and Jenna Fischer had such natural onscreen chemistry as Jim and Pam that it was almost hard to remember they were not in fact real people in a real relationship. They both have the chops to play funny and romantic, often at the same time, in a way better than I’ve ever seen. Their arc this season has been much debated, some praising the marital strife to show not even the Halperts have a perfect storybook relationship. Others, and I’m probably more in this camp, bemoaning it as a manufactured crisis to whip up some quick drama to breath some semblance of life into a dying franchise using its two most popular remaining characters. Maybe it’s not so much the concept of throwing a monkey wrench into Jim and Pam’s world I didn’t like, but the clunky execution. If they had stuck with just the Athlead/move-to-Philly storyline and skipped the whole Brian the sound guy angle, it may have come off a lot smoother and natural. Jim has, after all, had a penchant for making big decisions without filling in Pam on the details over the years and some other groundwork for Jim’s itchy feet had been laid this season when the Halperts attended Roy’s wedding to find him doing extremely well for himself. At any rate, everything was resolved in a satisfying way and Krasinski and Fischer were terrific in the finale (more on that later).

And what can you say about Rainn Wilson as Dwight K. Schrute? The beet farming, head-banging, paper loving, power hungry, grandson to a Nazi war criminal grandmutter. It would be easy to say that Dwight was not a realistic character, but having worked in an office with a real life person not that far off from Dwight, I have to concur with Jim in his warning to Young Jim that Dwight is “very real.” Wilson is the perfect moon-faced actor to play Dwight. Even with Dwight’s aggressive weirdness, Wilson was able to bring out his human qualities, whether it was the hurt after his breakup with Angela, or in watching his relationships with Jim and Pam evolve from adversarial to almost sibling-esque.

Those are the core four, so to speak, but The Office was home to a whole stable of great characters and actors who played them. Andy, the songbird with daddy issues and maligned (by character and critic alike) regional manager; grumpy, crossword master Stanley; know-it-all-Oscar; mysterious weirdo Creed; matronly-with-a-wild-streak Phyllis; severe cat-lover Angela; the narcissistic totally-wrong-yet-totally-right-for-each-other duo of Ryan and Kelly; high functioning alcoholic and rabies survivor Meredith; little orphan Erin; warehouse to penthouse Darryl; lovable doofus and Cup o’ Noodle connoisseur Kevin; put upon sad sack Toby; Roy, Nellie, Plop, Todd Packer, David Wallace, Jan Levinson (I presume), Charles Miner, Katie the purse girl….I could go on and on.

The reason we notice the sometimes precipitous declines of great athletes and TV shows is that they were great enough to hang around a long time in the first place and had reached the highest highs from which to fall. In the declining years we always say we wish they had called it quits earlier so we could have remembered them when they were at their best. But the truth is once they do finally hang it up and just a little bit of time has passed, the great moments far outweigh the bad. And maybe it was worth watching the deteriorating skills to catch those last few moments of greatness.

The Office finale was one such moment. Series finale’s are a tricky animal. Expectations are so high, especially for a show so beloved and hailed as The Office has been during it’s run (recent seasons not withstanding), they are almost impossible to live up to. The Office finale isn’t perfect, but it comes pretty darn close.

(If you haven’t watched it yet and you care, tread lightly beyond this point. Thar be spoilers ahead!)

The finale takes place about a year after the previous episode, which saw Dwight finally reach the career and personal pinnacles he always dreamed of: Regional Manager of Dunder Mifflin Scranton and engaged to Angela. Many of the Scrantonites have moved on to other things; Kevin and Toby were fired; Stanley retired; Andy became a renown laughing stock thanks to a viral video of his mental breakdown at a singing contest audition; Nellie moved to Poland; Darryl is doing well working for Athlead (now called Athleap); Creed is on the lam from the authorities. The PBS documentary about Dunder Mifflin aired during the previous episode, and the doc crew is back in town to get the gang back together for a panel discussion. Dwight and Angela’s wedding is the next day.

So there’s the setup.

What we get is a great last ride, that hit all the right notes. It may have hit a few extra we could have done without, but all the ones you’d want and expect were there. It was funny, it was sweet, it was poignant, it was emotional, but most of all it felt like The Office.

First the few things I wasn’t too keen on.
  • The reuniting of Erin with her birth parents. The orphan Erin storyline has always been sort of a D storyline in the show, so I thought this sudden resolution of it was a reach and a bit of a manipulative trick to squeeze out some easy tears. Sure, Erin’s parents could have seen her on the documentary, I guess, and made the journey to Scranton to reveal themselves to her, but who would actually do that in a public forum like that? I know, I know, it’s a TV show and they’re giving everyone their happy ending, but still, it seemed forced to me. That said, while I may not have loved the idea, the execution was great. Joan Cusack was really good as Erin’s mom and the rest of the cast’s reaction once they realized what was happening before Erin did was very authentic. So, bad idea, good execution.
  • Andy, Andy, Andy. Poor Andy. He’s been bashed enough I suppose. But let’s get one last lick in. Thanks to the Internet, Andy has finally achieved world wide fame. Just, not the kind he wanted. Now known the globe over as Baby Wawa thanks to his waterworks displayed at the singing contest audition, Andy managed to parlay that into a job at Cornell. Huh? The seniors invited him to speak at commencement week as a joke, but he shocked everyone when he actually delivered a moving address and was able to poke fun at himself. Mmmmm-kay. I know, TV show, happy ending, blah, blah, blah. I guess this Andy is just such a far cry from the Andy we first met in Season 3, everything he does sorta bothers me. He used to be a pretty good character, but that ship sailed long before he did for the Bahamas. Which, not coincidentally, was when this season’s better episodes aired (other than the last two).
  • You wouldn’t think a baby abandonment storyline would make it’s way into a sit-com series finale, but it managed to here. While it is completely in line with the characters, self-centered Ryan and Kellie, for them to abandon Ryan’s baby at Dwight and Angela’s wedding reception in a fit of lusty passion, it’s a pretty bold move. The baby did end up in the hands of Nellie, who wants to adopt it, but the whole incident was just odd.
But these are minor gripes. Overall, I thought the episode was great.

The Office was at its best when it blended biting comedy with heart, and while the finale had more heart then bite, it was just about the perfect balance given the circumstances. Here are some of the highlights, in my, oh so humble opinion:
  • I thought the writers did a nice job of giving Pam a forum to explain her reservations about moving to Philly. Yes, Jim jumped in with two-feet without cluing her in on his move to Athlead, but Pam sorta came off like a dream crusher for parts of the season. So, giving her the chance to give her reasons at the PBS Q & A was a nice touch.
  • Along with that, and going back to the episode before, I’m glad they never revealed what was in the card Jim took out of the Christmas box back in Season 2. It never could have lived up to expectations and was better left unsaid.
  • Sticking with Pam, giving her the last line of the series was the perfect coda. The Office was as much about Pam’s journey as anybody’s, so I was glad she got the last word.
  • And still sticking with Pam, and Jim, I thought they resolved the will-they-won’t-they-move arc very well. Even though after the previous episode Jim seemed more than happy to leave Athlead and stay in Scranton and the finale takes place a year later and he still seems content, if they had actually stayed I don’t know I would’ve assumed the Halpert’s would always have a happy ending. I mean, honestly what reason do they have to stay in Scranton? So, I thought they resolved it in a convincing way and now I know Jim and Pam will live happily ever after.
  • Dwight’s bachelor party was pretty great. And anytime we get more Mose it’s a good thing.
  • Everything about Michael’s appearance was perfect. From his first line (“That’s what she said,” as if it could have been anything else), to learning of his many children, and his only other line about his kids growing up and marrying each other, it was just the right amount of Michael. He already had his farewell, and it wouldn’t have been fair to overshadow the rest of the casts’ goodbye, but it also wouldn’t have felt right if he wasn’t there for Dwight’s wedding.
  • There were a lot of great call-backs. Dwight rehiring Devon who Michael fired in Season 2; Carol as the real estate agent handling the sale of Jim and Pam’s house; the same stripper for Dwight’s bachelor party as for Bob Vance’s in Season 4; Creed saying he still has his yogurt lid medal from the office Olympics. I’m always a sucker for that kind of stuff in TV shows and movie series. It makes the made up worlds seem real when the same secondary and tertiary characters reappear.
  • In true Office fashion, just when things looked like they were going to cross the line into sappy, a great joke would come to the rescue. Like when Kevin told Oscar he thought he was gay because he was crying, or Dwight speaking fondly of his co-workers, then correcting himself; his underlings.
  • What made The Office finale unique, was the documentary conceit made it possible for the characters to reflect on their years together in a way that seemed realistic and not a trite TV trope. Like in many a series finale, the characters waxed eloquent about the time they spent together and the changes in each other and themselves. But since they were speaking to a documentary crew, it was more believable then if two characters were just talking to each other about all the great times they had over these past nine years. Because who really does that? Jim, Pam, Dwight, Phyllis and the rest really could look back at the footage and see themselves change over the years, just like the fans could. To me it really captured, or recaptured maybe, that feeling The Office had in those early seasons that made these people seem real.
It’s pretty silly to get so attached to a TV show, but a good one makes you care about the characters, or at least makes you care what happens to them. There isn’t a group of TV characters I’ve cared more about then those from The Office. Despite some of their more outrageous antics, they seemed like real people working in a real office. And despite those outrageous moments—which were often hilarious—it was the subtle glances, awkward pauses, and raised eyebrows that really made it all so great. I’ll miss it.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Year in Reviews 2012: Movie Edition - Part 4



Blogger's Note:  Check out part 1, 2, and 3 if you missed them.  You won't be disappointed.  Well, you could be I guess.  But it's worth the risk.

As always, these are in no particular order.

Moonrise Kingdom (2012 - Wes Anderson) - If you've ever seen a Wes Anderson movie, you know you can spot a Wes Anderson movie a mile away.  He was in the hipster vanguard, dating back to 1998's Rushmore, which I love, and possibly to 1996's Bottle Rocket, which I've never seen love.  Every aesthetic aspect of Anderson's movies smacks of the Ironic 60's; from the mod costumes, to the British Invasion soundtracks, part homage and part parody. His movies are weird and whimsical, sometimes they work, sometimes they don't.  Moonrise Kingdom definitely works.  It's a story of young, forbidden love, 12 year old Khaki Scout Sam Shakusky falling in love with the slightly older Suzy Bishop.  The two run off together to the chagrin of Sam's foster parents, Suzy's attorney parents (played by Bill Murray and Frances McDormand), the Khaki Scout Master (played by Edward Norton), the local cop (played by Bruce Willis), and basically everyone else who inhabits the beautiful New England island of New Penzance.

The grown up cast also features Tilda Swinton, Harvey Keitel, and Jason Schwarztman.  All are great, as one would expect, but the kids are really what make the movie.  Jared Gillman as Sam and Kara Hayward as Suzy are the perfect pair to capture the innocence of a young and earnest love that doesn't really know any better.  More than any other of Anderson's movie, this one shows actual heart, rather than an ironic twist on what true sentiment might actually look like.  Not to say Moonrise is sentimental, because it's not, but it's Anderson's most honest movie yet and highly enjoyable.


Lawrence of Arabia (1962 - David Lean) - For my full take on 5 Things That Make Lawrence of Arabia the Consummate Epic click here.  I guarantee it's the only take on David Lean's classic that drops a quote from The Wire.


Fargo (1996 - Joel Coen) - I am a huge fan of the Coen brothers, and their classic crime story is without a doubt their masterpiece.  Not necessarily my favorite, but it's pretty great.  William H. Macy is a portrait of frustrated ineptitude as Jerry Lundegaard, a hapless car salesman who plots his wife's kidnap and ransom to extort money, and respect, from his wealthy father-in-law.  Unfortunately for Jerry, the criminal "professionals" he hires are only slightly less inept than he is and things go south in a hurry.  Steve Buscemi and Peter Stormare are the mismatched kidnapper duo; one neurotic and one a sociopath.  Frances McDormand is terrific as Marge Gunderson, the unassuming, sharp, and very pregnant, small town cop who is investigating the case.  Dark, funny, and full of awesome Midwest accents and cadence, it also sets the pace in movie uses for wood chippers.




The Cooler (2003 - Wayne Kramer) - Another great performance from William H. Macy, this time as Bernie Lootz, a hard luck gambler employed by one of the last old school, pre-corporate casinos in Las Vegas as a cooler.  When a player gets hot at the black jack table or roulette wheel, they send in Bernie, a walking whatever-the-opposite-of-a-rabbits-foot-is and suddenly lady luck waves bye bye.  But when Bernie falls for waitress Natalie, played by Maria Bello, his luck, begins to change.  And that's bad for business.  Alec Baldwin stars as Shelly Kaplow, the hard core casino boss trying to hold on to the joint before the corporations take him over too.  He is none too pleased with Bernie's sudden stroke of good fortune.  He's old Vegas to the core, preferring to solve his problems with a ballpean hammer when possible.  A pretty good show about luck, destiny, and choices.  However, I saw Macy's butt on multiple occasions so that may have soured it for me a little.


Winnebago Man (2009 - Ben Steinbauer) - I wrote a full blown review of Winnebago Man a while back.  It's one of the most entertaining and thoughtful documentaries I've seen in a while.  Predictably funny, surprisingly poignant, and full of swearing.



Sunday, February 24, 2013

Zero Dark Thirty

A few minutes after I left the theater I became aware my jaw was sore.  At first I didn't know why, then I realized I had been clenching my teeth for nearly the duration of the movie, Zero Dark Thirty, director Kathryn Bigelow's taut and riveting account of the hunt for Osama bin Laden.  The amazing part of my jaw soreness, is that while there is action to be had, in particular the assault on bin Laden's compound, most of the movie takes place in drab CIA offices or dingy CIA prison cells, or "Black Sites."

Zero Dark Thirty, unsurprisingly I suppose, has generated quite a bit of controversy over the scenes that take place in those far off secret prisons.  Namely, torture generally; waterboarding specifically.  The movie does not shy away from showing the "enhanced interrogation techniques" in action.  As anyone who has even accidentally watched the news in the last 10 years should know, the debate over the use of these methods has been spirited to say the least.  The movies portrayal of CIA operatives using torture to extract intelligence that eventually lead to discovering bin Laden's hideout is disputed by such disparate senatorial luminaries as John McCane and Diane Feinstein.  The official US government line is that waterboarding and it's equally unpleasant cousins were not used in the search for bin Laden...or at least did not result in useful intel.  However, Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal have stuck to their guns and insist that they based their screenplay on actual first person accounts of the events.  So, who knows I guess.  Regardless of where you stand on the issue, to say the torture scenes are uncomfortable is putting it mildly.

But, fortunately, there is much more to the movie than just that.  Jessica Chastain is a young CIA operative named Maya who we meet in 2003 when she arrives in Pakistan.  She is part of the group responsible for following leads on the whereabouts of bin Laden.  She seems in over her head at first, even frail, but quickly shows a steely will behind her delicate, porcelain facade.  She believes if they can find bin Laden's courier, he will eventually lead them to the Osama.  The process is agonizingly tedious; as leads dry up or hit dead ends the years drag on and for Maya's bosses, finding bin Laden becomes more and more of a secondary, or even lower, priority.  But Maya doggedly, and irritatingly to her superiors, refuses to give up.

In the same way Lincoln--a movie whose only other similarity is that it chronicles an important chapter of American History--excels at making a bunch of conversations about government a fascinating thing to watch, so does Zero Dark Thirty with conversations about intelligence.  I'll grant that not everyone is going to enjoy that; it can be very technical and jargony.  Some may find themselves scratching their heads at terms like "op sec" and "tradecraft."  But the pace is hardly plodding, and we zip through the years of the hunt at a breakneck pace.  As I alluded to at the beginning, this will be considered an action movie by some, but there is not as much shoot 'em up action as you might expect.  Despite that, the movie never relaxes and I was always anticipating something happening...in a good way.  Whether it was a suicide bombing, a shootout, or a new nugget of intel coming in.  Who knew a conference room could be so intense?

This is due in no small part to the great perfromances from the supporting cast.  Chastain is really the only main character and is terrific, but the others are very good as well.  Kyle Chandler, Jennifer Ehle, and Jason Clark all turn in excellent performances as fellow CIA staffers.

When the real action finally does begin, it's fantastic.  Of course, this is the raid on bin Laden's hideaway.  It's an incredible set piece, with Navy SEALs slicing through the shadows with surgical precision.  A lot of it is shown from their POV through night vision goggles and there is no soundtrack other than the scuffle of boots on the ground, pinpoint machine gunfire, and their communications.  It's gripping despite the known outcome.

It's not a perfect movie, and one does wonder about how factual it actually is, essentially making the case that a single CIA operative was the driving force in pushing the hunt for bin Laden forward for over a decade.  But it is a movie after all, not an historical record, and it's strengths more then outweigh it's weaknesses.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Die Hard

Mostly for reasons explained elsewhere I missed out on a lot of the 80's and early 90's era action movies. I have since made up for lost time, checking many if the "classics" off my list: Terminator 1 & 2, Rambo, Predator, Commando, Big Trouble in Little China, Lethal Weapon, etc. (To this day I've still never seen a Jean Claude van Damme movie, but somehow I don't think I'm missing much there.). Their was a gap in my catalog, though, a gaping one. I had never seen a Die Hard movie. This wasn't intentional, it was just one of those things. Recently, I finally had my chance,or so I thought.

I few months ago I DVR'd Die Hard off of HBO, along with several hours of other movies my wife had no interest in watching. In an effort to free up some space for some TV shows based on fairy tails or something, my wife decided to erase some of my movies. Being the considerate woman that she is, even when erasing my unwatched movies, she made an effort to erase the most likely to have already been seen.  When I returned home one night to find Die Hard missing I was incredulous.

"Why did you erase Die Hard?!"
"I needed the space and it was the oldest one.  What's the big deal, you've seen Die Hard before."
"No I haven't!"
"Really?"
"No."
"Really??"

When even your wife is shocked to learn you've never seen Die Hard--and she has!--it's time to take matters into your hands to rightfully reclaim your man card.  Once word got out to a few of my buddies, it became our collective mission to get me to the Greek, so to speak.  And no, I haven't seen that movie either, fortunately.

So, on Monday three of my buddies, (all Critical Errors contributors) Peter, Rhett, and Josh came over to join me on my maiden viewing.  If only I had known what I was missing!

Die Hard may be the best action movie in the long and storied history action movies.  I type that without an iota of irony in my meaning.  It is seriously great.

Being most likely the last man standing not to have seen it, I'll skip an indepth rehash of the plot.  To put it into a couple of sentences, Bruce Willis stars as NYPD cop John McClane who is in LA to try to patch things up with his estranged wife, a big wig at a multi-national corporation.  While visiting her at her company Christmas party in a high-rise office building, terrorists lead by Hans Gruber (Alan Rickman) take over the building; action-comedy thrill ride ensues.

That's one of the things that makes it work.  The plot is simple, not surprising for an action movie, but also reasonably plausible.  No, in real life McClane is unlikely to survive the ordeal and no one's finger tips are that strong, but director John McTiernan does a great job of pushing the action envelope of plausibility to the very limits without somehow ripping it clean open.  Make no mistake, he comes very close to shredding the envelope into a thousand tiny pieces, but doesn't quite get there.  Not only is the action plausible, but holds up remarkably well for a 25 year old movie.  Yes, you read that right.  Die Hard is 25 years old!  But other than the costumes, cars, and maybe a couple other minor details, Die Hard may as well have been made last month.  No small feat when you consider the high-tech special effects we all take for granted these days.

Another strength are the two leads, Bruce Willis and Alan Rickman.  The screenplay blesses both with some really great things to say, and they both say them with appropriate zeal.  Willis as the wry, streetwise cop cracking wise and Rickman as a smart smooth talking German with a dry wit of a Brit.  Any action movie worth it's weight in C4 explosive needs a few memorable one-liners and it's like Willis and Rickman were in a contest of who could deliver the most and the best one.  Tough call, but Rickman's dead pan, "I read about them in Time magazine," might be my favorite line in the movie.  It's probably a better line in context.  Are there some cheeseball lines in there?  Heck yes!  But, again...action movie.

There is one glaring weakness, however, and it nearly kills the momentum about halfway through.  After LAPD beat sergeant Al Powell, played by who children of the '90's will recognize as Carl Winslow from Family Matters Reginald VelJohnson, is tipped off by McClane that terrorist have taken hostages (by dropping a dead terrorist onto the hood of his squad car--brilliant), Powell calls in the cavalry, the rest of LAPD.  While VelJohnson is fine as the lifeline to McClane over the radio, the weakness is Paul Gleason as Deputy Chief of Police Dwayne T. Robinson.  It's not Gleason's fault really.  Robinson is written like the biggest twit in law enforcement.  He's a boorish idiot and it really doesn't serve the plot in any meaningful way for him to be so.  It comes off as lazy to have the suit-wearing-desk-jockey-cop-in-charge be an utter moron, but fortunately after his initial appearance he only shows up in small doses for the rest of the movie.  The movie has so much going for it that he doesn't ruin everything, but it definitely went off the rails for a bit.

Fortunately, it finishes strong.

Bottom line, I had a blast--pun intended--watching it with my buddies and is one of the most enjoyable action movies I've ever seen.  The experience was definitely enhanced by watching it with a bunch of guys cracking one-liners of their own and remembering the big moments and telling me,"Dude, this next part is awesome!"  But it's not crazy to say it's the best ever, in 1988 or 2018.  Yippe kay yay....well, you know the rest.


Friday, February 1, 2013

TV Extravaganza: 30 Rock, The Americans, Parenthood

Well, my last post went over like a lead balloon.  Apparently not a lot of 1980's game show enthusiasts trolling my corner of the web or among my loyal fans.  Oh well, I enjoyed the walk down whammy lane.

Moving on.

Let's talk TV.  Three things:

1.  Yesterday was the series finale of 30 Rock.  To which I can only say, blerg.  My wife and I have been fans of Tina Fey's brainchild since the beginning, thanks to Jenna Fischer--no, really (thank you MySpace)--and it has been one fun ride.  No show could match 30 Rock's jokes-per-minute pace, save for maybe Arrested Developement but the cats at TGS are the champs by volume (thanks to AD's tragically short run).  There have been so many great gags and throw-away lines over it's seven seasons that it's immently rewatchable.  I love watching old episodes and culling out new one-liners for every occasions.  I'd love to have the comedic mind-grapes of Tina Fey and her slew of writers.

Besides the terrific jokes, what made 30 Rock unique was there was never any of that cliche' staple of the sitcom of the two leads of opposite sex ever hooking up.  Fey's frazzeled and trying-to-have-it-all Liz Lemon and Alec Baldwin's Vice President of East Coast Televison and Microwave Progarmming Jack Donaghy were close plutonically, rare in TV shows, and well, life, I guess.  But as weird and unlikely buddies, Fey, the liberal "artist" with a degree in Theater Tech and an unhealthy relationship with ham, and Baldwin, as the conservative corporate raider with mommy issues and a perfect head suit, had more on screen chemistry than most TV "couples."

Liz Lemon and Jack Donaghy are two of the greatest television characters ever.  There supporing cast was pretty great too.  Tracy Morgan's Tracy Jordan is the hilarious amalgem of every crazy celebrity to grace the headlines of TMZ, and Morgan is alarmingly natural in the role.  Jenna Maroney, played by Jane Krakowski, is equally insane, never growing out of the paranoid insecurity of a second-rate child star from Florida.  Results were mixed with Jenna, but still solid comedic chops from Krakowski.  The ancillary characters were great too:  applefaced goon and possibly immortal Kenneth the page, balding submits-to-dominant-exercise-dummies Pete, Twofer, Frank, and even Lutz.

Though comedy was obviously king, 30 Rock had no shortage of heart and was adept at pulling it off without being cloying or precious.  The end of the penultimate episode is the perfect example, a heartwarming final moment that is still funny and so 30 Rock.

I will miss Liz and Jack and the rest of the TGS gang.

2.  Watched the pilot for the new FX show The Americans.  Pretty great.  It stars Keri Russell and Matthew Rhys as Elizabeth and Philip Jennings, Soviet spies living as a married American couple in early 1980's Washington, DC.  When I first heard about this show I was very excited, as I love Cold War era spy stuff, but I was concerned with the casting of Keri Russell.  I haven't seen her in much, I was never a Felicity watcher, but the with few times I'd seen her in something and her cutsie look, I wasn't sure if she had the gravitas to play a ruthless KGB operative.  Uh, wrong.  She's like Shaft; a bad motha--shut your mouth!  Granted, it's only been one episode, but she is ruthless and intense.  Rhys is more than solid as well, but as the softer touch of the two.  It's a pretty clever plan by the producers, to make the husband the half of the spy couple who seems more enticed by the American way of life.

From the looks of the pilot, the series will feature plenty of action, some intense old school cloak-and-dagger stuff, the mental toll of duty to county and possiblity of the good life as a defector, the moral ambiguity of the espionage game on both sides, not to mention the equally ambiguous nature of a family life built on a lie.  The couple has two pre-teen kids who don't know what their parents really are and at times it appears Elizabeth and Philip aren't really sure who or what they are either.

It was a great opening to the series and I'm looking forward to more.

3.  The wife and I finally started watching Parenthood the other night.  Not the Ron Howard directed movie, but the Ron Howard produced TV show.  We had watched the first couple episodes a couple years ago and really enjoyed it, but for some reason never followed up with it.  Inspired by a Grantland article encouraging binge watching it, we gave it nother go and ended up mini-binging the first four episodes in one shot.

Couldn't be more different than The Americans, or Breaking Bad  or Mad Men or the host of other acclaimed TV dramas of the past several years.  And I think that's why I like it.  While I do love many of those shows, they're all pretty dark and heavy, so it's nice to have a drama that is a little more lighthearted and a lot more relatable.  Not that Parenthood is all giggles and smiles, like any real family the Braverman's have real family problems, and the show has gotten a repuation as an eye-wetter, but tonally it is much different from any of those other shows.  Sometimes something good happens!  And very few people die or get their feet run over by riding lawnmowers.

The performances feel authentic.  Peter Krause, Monica Potter, Craig T. Nelson, Dax Shepherd, Lauren Graham, and the rest of the cast are all great.  They seem like they might actually be a real family.

It's a family drama that rings true as it warms the heart and wets the eyes.  Looking forward to binge watching some more soon.

Friday, January 25, 2013

5 Things That Make Press Your Luck the Best 1980's Game Show

Taking a little break from our Year in Reviews 2012:  Movies Edition series to pay homage to that staple of 1980's day time TV:  the game show.  Specifically, one of my personal favorites, the ridiculous and whammirific Press Your Luck!  The Price is Right is the indisputable king of daytime TV game shows--synergistic fact, Rod Roddy was the announcer for both The Price is Right and Press Your Luck--a title I certainly will not contradict here.  But thanks to the magic of reruns and the geniuses of programming at the Game Show Network (GSN), here are five things that make Press Your Luck the best 1980's game show.

1.  1980's Contestants

I loved Press Your Luck as a kid during it's three year run from 1983 to 1986.  But it is immeasurably more entertaining looking back through our retro spyglass.  I was but a small child in the '80's so my perspective is a bit hazy, so a question to all you older folks:  was everyone just ugly and/or awkward looking during the Reagan years?  It's not just the bad haircuts, earth tone blazers, novelty sized eyeglasses, bushy mustaches, or in some cases all of the above.  You don't have to look too hard at your nearest hipster hangout to see a lot of "fashion" of the era has come back, and with a vengeance.  So it's not just the style, but the people themselves.  Everyone either appears to be a giant dork or a hayseed.  This was long before the reality TV era, where everyone and their uncle's cat thinks they can and should be on TV.  You can see a noticeable difference in the sensibilities of the eras.  I'm sure the producers told the contestants to act excited and whatnot, and you can see that their trying so hard.  But John and Jane Q 1980's were, generally, just not ready for the spotlight.  On a recently viewed episode, one of the female contestants, Bea, was so nervous on camera she could barely even speak!  Sort of an important aspect of game show contestanting.  Can you imagine such a thing on today's game shows, like Minute to Win It or Who Wants to be a Millionaire?  It's the exact opposite.  With the exceptions of Jeopardy, Wheel of Fortune, and the Price is Right--all hold overs from the golden age of game shows mind  you--contestants on today's shows never shut up.  Before each question or challenge we're subjected to some inane reasoning for their answer or an obnoxious soliloquy about how when they're grandmother used to bake apple cobbler she always made sure to grease the pan with genuine hog lard and that memory gave the contestant the insight needed to complete the challenge in record time.  Or something equally stupid.  Yes, even Press Your Luck had it's share of blowhards, but they were much fewer and further between.  So, awkward and ill-dressed as they are, give me the unassuming not ready for prime time game show contestant of the '80's any day over today's fame seeking blabbermouth.

2.  Terrible Prizes

If you're not familiar with Press Your Luck here's how it worked.  It featured three contestants who would buzz in to answer a series of trivia questions to win "spins."  Their were two rounds of questions, and after each round contestants would get a chance to use their spins on the "Big Board."  The Big Board features many squares displaying dollar values or fabulous prizes.  And of course, the whammies (more on those later).  A lighted border would flash around the various squares and when a player would hit their buzzer and yell "STOP!" one square would remain lit, netting the contestant either a whammy, cash, or fabulous prize.  Except many of the prizes were far from fabulous.

Examples:

  • A water conditioner - Huh.  A really nice, practical prize, I'm sure.  But maybe the most unexciting prize ever.  Wouldn't you have to live somewhere with the most mineral enriched water ever to truly appreciate a game show water conditioner?  As in, your faucet is basically dispensing rocks?
  • A graphic - To this day I'm still not sure what this is.  The prize tile simply read "Graphic" and had a poor representation of American Gothic displayed on it.  I'm guessing it's art of some kind?  Why wouldn't you just say that?  Art.  Doesn't that sound better than Graphic?  Am I getting a decal to stick on the side of my car?  Or a single graphic on a floppy disc to display on my Tandy?  This still boggles my mind--way more than it should.
  • A Jog 'n Tramp - Um, we actually had one of these.  Pretty fun as a little kid.  Pretty awful as a game show prize.
  • A silver service - Great, something to collect dust in my china cabinet.  Has anyone ever actually used one of these sets to serve tea?
  • A trip to Concord, CA - So........I.......wha......I just.........huh.  Concord.
  • Silver gifts - What's with all the silver stuff?  Who's picking the prizes, Paul Revere?  And what exactly are silver gifts?  Is this a sneaky way of unloading the leftover silver services from the warehouse?  Is it a pocket watch, a paperweight, just a solid bar of silver?  These are questions that need answers.
  • Catamaran - This is my personal favorite.  It's the epitome of impractical game show prizes.  Sure, it might be fun on the open water, the wind in your face and sea mist in your hair.  Too bad it's going to spend the next decade taking up room in your garage or costing you money at a self storage facility.
3.  Horrible production values

Compared to the high-tech, slick TV programming we have today, a lot of vintage TV looks pretty creaky.  Bad sound, fuzzy pictures, cheesy graphics and special effects are not the fault of the era.  They were doing the best they could with what they had.  But even amongst its contemporaries, Press Your Luck was pretty bad.  On more than one occasion I've seen cue card holders and stage hands clearly in the frame.  It's not like this was a live broadcast.  Couldn't they have re-shot those sequences.  Other times I've noticed people just sort of milling around behind the set, their silhouettes clearly visible behind the host.  When the contestants would hit their buzzers to answer the trivia questions, it sounds like you or way slapping our dining room table.  Presumably, the buzzers were not active until the host finished reading the question and only then would they actually buzz when struck.  But contestants were always trying to buzz in early, so there was always cacophony of table slapping to accompany the questions.  It just really hurt the overall professionalism of the show.  No, really.  Also, sometimes the tiles on the Big Board wouldn't light up and you'd just have empty spaces.  Or pieces of the set literally falling apart on camera.  I guess that's what separates the greats from the rest.  Can you ever remember Plinko on the Price is Right not working correctly, or some stage hand loitering just behind Alex Trebek?  I didn't think so.

4  Host Peter Tomarken

Do people aspire to be game show hosts, I wonder?  Well, if Peter Tomarken ever did he certainly found his calling.  The perfect blend of smarm and charm, he was actually kinda funny and appeared to have a good time ribbing the contestants.  Always with a smile that seemed genuine, he signed on with, "Welcome to Press Your Luck, the game where you can win a bundle or lose your shirt," and always signed off with a goofy little poem about whammies.  They were always terrible.  At one point they were sent in from viewers at home (allegedly).  Who would actually take the time and then spend the stamp to sent it in.  But as game show hosts go, he was pretty good.  Not as dignified as Trebek or Barker, not as creepy as Richard Dawson or Wink Martindale after too many plastic surgeries, it's a shame he never did much of note after Press Your Luck.

5.  The Whammies

As mentioned earlier. other cash and prizes, whammies also resided on the Big Board.  If you hit a whammy, a devilish looking little cartoon creature that bore a resemblance to the Tasmanian Devil wearing a cape, you lost all your money and prizes.  Get four whammies in a game and your disqualified.  As a kid I loved the whammies.  When a player got one a little cartoon whammy would appear next to the players money total, manically laughing and erasing their winnings with a lawnmower, WWI era fighter plane, or by moonwalking across them (this was the 80's after all), or other such silliness.  It's a ridiculous gimmick that fans of the show love and haters hate.  Because that's what they do; haters gonna hate.

Bonus Reason:

In 1984 was embroiled in something of a scandal when contestant Michael Larson won over $110,000 utilizing 47 spins in one game, both a record by far.  The game actually had to be split between two episodes.  Believing Larson must have cheated, CBS initially refused to give him his winnings.  However, they could never prove it.  Larson had learned the pattern of the flashing lights and timed his buzzes accordingly.  His run is available on YouTube and is pretty fun to watch.  You can almost hear the producers' brains exploding.  Tragically, Larson lost all his money in bad business deals and died in 1999 of throat cancer.  He was only 50 when he died, though he looks like he was pushing 65 at the time of his winnings in 1984.  People just looked older back in the olden days I guess.

Here's Larson's record-breaking run:


Saturday, January 12, 2013

Year in Reviews 2012: Movie Edition - Part 3


Blogger's Note:  Be sure to check out parts One and Two, if you missed  them.  You know you want to.

In our last installment we recapped Tree of Life, The Old Man and the Sea, Gone with the Wind, The Dust Bowl, and Red Tails.  What wonders will this edition bestow!

Midnight In Paris (2011 - Woody Allen) - Other than this one, I think I've only seen two other Woody Allen movies from start to finish, the mildly amusing Small Time Crooks, which I don't remember that much about except that I found it mildly amusing.  The other is Bananas, which I remember was actually pretty funny (that's about three steps ahead of mildly amusing).  I enjoyed Midnight in Paris.  Owen Wilson stars as a hacky screenwriter looking for inspiration to write a novel while in Paris with his neurotic fiance and her kooky rich parents.  On a late night walk he stumbles into an alternate universe where he is in 1920's Paris, rubbing elbows with F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemmingway, Salvador Dali, and a few other notable artists and authors of the era.  It's a lighthearted fantastic sort of movie, with good performances from Wilson, Rachel McAdams, and especially Michael Sheen as an uber-pretentious self-proclaimed expert on all things Paris.  The famous figures of the past are perfectly funny caricatures, particularly the manly man Ernest Hemmingway.  Dos Equis guy has nothing on him.  The dialog is clever and it probably helps that Woody is not actually saying the lines he's written.



Three Kings (1999 - David O. Russell) - A pretty underrated movie and one of Clooney's first meaty movie roles--ie not a cheesy action flick, rom-com, or franchise crushing comicbook movie.  Clooney plays an Army major during the closing days Desert Storm with doubts about the war.  He catches wind of a map a trio of non-coms find in an Iraqi soldier's hindparts that supposedly leads to a cache of Kuwaiti gold stolen by the Iraqis.  Seeking to get something out of his days in the desert, Clooney and his booty map (double-meaning!) finding cohorts, ably played by Mark Walberg, Ice Cube, and Spike Jonze, take off to find the gold and end up in a series of sticky ceasefire situations involving the Iraqi Republican Guard, anti-Saddam partisans, and an exploding cow.  Among other things.  Director David O. Russell, who is getting love recently for his Oscar nominated Silver Linings Playbook, co-wrote the script which is both funny and thought provoking, which really all war movies should be.  Very solid flick.  I hadn't seen it for a long time and had forgotten how much I liked it.


How to Train Your Dragon (2010 - Dave Dubois and Chris Sanders) - I watched about half of Steven Spielberg's War Horse today, which is a similar type of story as How to Train Your Dragon, and I found the latter to be exceedingly more entertaining.  Granted they aren't exactly the same kind of movie, slapstick gags and one-liners may have been a little out of place in the WWI horse tale, but they're both "boy and his dog/horse/dragon" stories, where the lead character forms a bond with a creature and some sort of serration or crisis gets between them and the boy vows to never forget/desert the creature.  I won't be too hard on War Horse since I haven't seen it all the way through, but just as I wouldn't expect it to play for laughs, I would expecte it to go for the heart strings.  From what I've seen thus far Dragon tops Horse even in that respect, on top of being funny and exciting.  Rango was my favorite animated film I saw last year, but Dragon wasn't too far behind and had the added advantage of being something I could watch with my four year old daughter.


Rango (2011 - Gore Verbinski) - And speaking of the animated noir with a chamaleon in the lead role, here is my full-blow review of Rango from a few months back.  I really liked it.


From Here to Eternity (1953 - Fred Zinnermann) - Probably one of the most famous images from classic movies, Burt Lancaster and Deborah Kerr sucking face on the beach as the tides washes over them, comes from this movie.  Starring Lancaster, Kerr, Frank Sinatra, Donna Reed, Montgomery Clift, and Ernest Borgnine, the melodrama based on the racy novel of the same name, tracks the lives of the characters in and around an Army base at Pearl Harbor in the days before December 7th, 1941.  Honor, duty, infidelity, intimidation, love, scandal, friendship; it's all there.  Good performances all around, particularly Ernest Borgnine as scuzzy Sgt. Fatso Judson.  Legend has it Sinatra secured his role with a little help from his Mafia friends, providing the inspiration for the Johnny Fontane character in The Godfather.  No word on how many horses lost their heads to make it happen.


Stay tuned for Part 4.